Clinical Negligence

Delayed Diagnosis

Expert psychological evaluation of delayed diagnosis, addressing breach of duty and the resulting psychological harm. We provide comprehensive clinical negligence reports with urgent availability for expert witness testimony.

HCPC-Registered Psychologists
CPR Part 35 Compliant
Urgent Reports in 1-4 Days

Expert Type

  • Forensic Psychologist
  • Practitioner Psychologist
  • Clinical Psychologist
  • Neuropsychologist

Applicable Law

  • Civil Procedure Rules Part 35
  • Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]
  • Bolitho v City and Hackney HA [1997]
  • Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015]
  • The Human Rights Act 1998

When Needed

This assessment is required when a claimant alleges that a failure to diagnose a psychological condition led to a preventable deterioration in their mental health or physical wellbeing.

What Is a Delayed Diagnosis Assessment?

A delayed diagnosis assessment is a psychological evaluation of the timing, consequences and clinical context of a mental health diagnosis. A psychologist may provide an opinion on the standard expected of a psychological practitioner where that issue falls within the expert’s competence. Where the alleged diagnostic failure concerns a doctor, prescriber or another professional discipline, an appropriately qualified expert from that discipline is required.

The evaluation focuses on the legal tests for clinical negligence, specifically addressing whether the delay constituted a breach of duty. It further explores causation, identifying whether the failure to diagnose caused specific psychological injury or exacerbated existing psychological symptoms that would otherwise have been mitigated by early intervention.

  • Breach of duty — whether the diagnostic process met the required Bolam standard
  • Causation — the clinical link between the delay and the subsequent injury
  • Standard of care — evaluation against contemporary clinical guidelines and peer practice
  • Avoidable harm — identifying symptoms that would have been prevented by earlier treatment
  • Prognostic impact — how the delay has altered the long-term clinical outlook
  • Material contribution — whether the delay significantly contributed to the claimant’s current state

These assessments require experts with specific forensic expertise who understand the complexities of psychological presentation and the nuances of the litigation process. Our psychologists provide robust, evidence-based opinions that withstand rigorous cross-examination in court.

The expert considers differential diagnoses that should have been explored and evaluates whether the diagnostic pathway followed by the defendant was clinically justifiable under the circumstances at the time.

Key Assessment Components

Our assessment evaluates the following areas:

Record Review

A meticulous analysis of medical records to identify missed diagnostic opportunities and clinical red flags.

Clinical Interview

A detailed examination of the claimant to assess current psychological status and symptom history.

Bolam Assessment

Evaluating whether the diagnostic approach would be supported by a responsible body of medical opinion within the relevant specialty.

Causation Analysis

Determining, on the balance of probabilities, whether the prognosis would have been materially better with timely intervention and treatment.

Quantum Guidance

Providing clinical evidence necessary to assist the court in assessing damages related to prolonged psychological injury.

Treatment Recommendations

Outlining remedial therapies required to address the consequences of the delayed diagnosis.

Conditions That May Affect This Assessment

A range of psychological conditions can affect this assessment. These include:

Psychotic disorders (Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder)
Mood disorders (Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder)
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Personality Disorders
Neurodevelopmental conditions (ADHD, ASD)
Early-onset Dementia or organic brain syndromes

The impact of a delay can vary significantly depending on the clinical trajectory and the specific nature of the psychological condition.

Assessment Process

  1. Instruction Received

    Formal instructions and all relevant medical bundles are reviewed by our clinical team.

  2. Expert Matched

    We match the case to a psychologist with specific expertise in the relevant clinical field.

  3. Assessment Conducted

    A thorough clinical interview and file review are completed to establish the timeline of events.

  4. Report Delivered

    A CPR Part 35–compliant report is delivered, addressing breach, causation, and prognosis.

Turnaround Times

Urgency Level Timescale
Standard Report 4-6 weeks from assessment
Priority Report 1-2 weeks
Urgent Report 1-4 days
We provide rapid turnaround for delayed diagnosis reports, ensuring expert witness testimony is delivered within critical court windows.

What’s Included in the Report

Detailed chronology of psychological history
Analysis of the diagnostic process
Review of all available medical records
Opinion on breach of duty (applying Bolam and Bolitho principles)
Causation analysis (but-for test)
Assessment of current mental state
Impact of the delay on prognosis
ICD-11 or DSM-5 diagnostic criteria
Response to specific instructions
Statement of truth and CPR Part 35 compliance

All reports are authored by seasoned experts experienced in providing oral testimony in the High Court and County Court.

Frequently Asked Questions

Need a Delayed Diagnosis Report?

Contact us today for a delayed diagnosis assessment. We provide expert witness CVs and transparent quotes within 60 minutes.